Startpagina
|
THE UNDERTONE
About life, evolution, perspective, our task, and the
completion
C.A. Sander
INTRODUCTION
We live in troubled times. Thousands of people are being
slaughtered; everywhere war is being waged, even if only on
a small scale, and in different parts of the world fighting
takes place with alarming frequency. The great powers do not
trust each other, causing nationalism and militarism, resulting
again in a sense of danger. In such a situation it becomes
difficult to look forward to the future with trust.
This document has been written so that, in spite of the worries
brought on by the current situation and the bad events which we
may still have to experience, we will hold on to faith
in life or regain it. If we consider closely the facts at our
disposal, we will see that we are certainly participants in a
great cosmic project with the task of acting as involved partners.
In the following text this vision will be strengthened
and explained. It will then become clear that life should not be
seen as a cosmic aberration resulting from a series of random
happenings, but is part of a great cosmic plan.
It will then become clear that our task is to work on this project
with as much verve and inspiration as possible. There was a time
when politics was primarily responsible for the care of social
improvements, the fight against inhuman trends and warding off
social dangers. This task of the political system has not
disappeared but has decreased in potential and relevance. If we as
citizens leave politics to deal with everything, much will go
wrong; it is absolutely necessary that we start to roll up our
sleeves. Therefore, in the future more work will have to be done
by individuals, institutions, casual groups, societies,
corporations and in some circumstances, governments of those
countries which are ruled by sensible and wise people.
WHY WE HAVE TO KEEP ENCOURAGING
OUR FAITH IN LIFE
We have lived for thousands of years from one generation to the
next with repeated questions:
Why all this? What
are we doing here? Where is all this going? The answers of gods,
prophets and high priests have sometimes been believed and have
reassured us, but not for long.
And now that we have arrived in the twenty-first century we
finally want to hear the right answer. Is there one? The
answer is: it is certainly possible.
Let us look at the research into this vision.
- The four basic forces of nature, i.e. electromagnetism,
gravitation, the strong and weak forces are unbelievably
precisely determined; so precise that it is almost impossible to
assume that they have not been devised by a cosmic
intelligence. In Addendum 1, the precision with which the
four basic forces are determined will be explained and
clarified.
It is good to realise that, because
of the precise determination of the four basic forces, certain
events become possible. Examples: the existence of atoms as well
as molecules; the same applies to stars with a long life of
several billion years and the heavier supernovas (stars with a
short life of about 100 million years), which when exploded are
the cause of formation of all the higher elements (such as oxygen,
carbon, phosphorus and the metals chlorine and silicon) and those
free elements are captured by stars and eventually form the
planets of the stars. Moreover, it results in the creation of
Earth, the one planet which fulfils the conditions of life, which
eventually produces Man.
- What is the purpose of making the four basic forces of nature
so unbelievably precise? There is actually only one fitting
answer it seems: there must be an intention behind the point of
big bang and the determination of the four basic forces.
- It would be difficult for there to be another intention (as
provisionally seen) than the following: the completion of
evolution culminating in the creation of Earth (with its very
particular properties) and consequently in the biological
evolution resulting in Mankind.
- Earth is an extremely exceptional celestial body (see
Addendum 2 where the particular properties of Earth as a life
supporting celestial body are explained); the properties are so
unusual that it is almost certainly possible, if not probable
that all the other 1022 celestial bodies in the
universe are necessary for the creation of that one highly
exceptional body, thus forming together a kind of by-product of
the creation of Earth.
- Life has taken approximately four billion years to produce a
thinking creature in the form of Man, the most complex result of
evolution. In the light of reason it seems that Man has now come
to the high point of celestial evolution.
- Within Mankind some important developments have already taken
place, even if only partially: the Democratic Constitutional
State, Compassion (also towards animals), a sense of
responsibility, and human love; science and technology can also
be included in this respect. Without science and technology it
would for instance not be possible for this writing to be
composed and disseminated. The intentional process of which we
talk has to eventually result in something. As life on Earth
after the end of the Sun also has to disappear, the culmination
point must be reached before the end of Earth and possibly long
before then. In view of the acceleration which we notice in
evolution (which also includes the civilisation process), this
point lies possibly in the near future.
- It is quite possible that Mankind will reach a state of
perfection and that the evolutionary process is constantly
pushing in that direction in such a way that this state is
becoming inevitable. By that time evolution has, so it appears,
achieved its task, even at the price of much suffering and
sorrow. As to how the completion will look we had better not
speculate. It is possible that this lies beyond space and time
and we can but hope that this gigantic investment in evolution
and life will pay off. Perhaps it is also significant to realise
that evolution has most probably completed more than 99.99% of
its journey.
- What about the suffering that billions of people and animals
have had to endure through time? That is possibly the
unavoidable price that has to be paid.
The question is now: What are we to do? The world, it seems, is
constantly being pushed through evolution in the right direction.
In this process the immature human tendencies constantly cause
disturbances, as seen by their wars, their unshakable but wrong
convictions, their intolerance, their materialism, their
hardheartedness and their lack of courage. The answer to this
question is probably in the first instance the encouragement of
character building as discussed in Addendum 3, which deals with a
number of tasks which we could and should tackle.
CONCLUSION
We hope that this argument is not only based on sound insight, but
will also be acknowledged as such. It will then leave its mark on
philosophy, sociology and possibly on theology, but above all, on
conduct (of authorities, individuals and organisations). Let us
also understand that the basic thoughts of the great religions are
not in conflict with these insights, although not everyone will
agree with that.
This argument will, it is hoped, give people a certain sense of
direction in their lives, in spite of a number of disturbing, if
not frightening developments. Probably, all the worries, scares
and suffering will come to an end, however difficult it is to
accept this insight. And for ‘now’ may this pamphlet inspire us
and urge us on to work on our tasks.
ADDENDUM 1.
ABOUT THE PARTICULAR WAY IN
WHICH THE FOUR BASIC FORCES OF NATURE ARE DETERMINED
The four basic forces of nature are electromagnetism,
gravity, the strong and the weak forces are extremely
accurately determined. If, for instance, the electromagnetic
force were to be fractionally stronger, the electrons
would be tied to the atomic nucleus; the formation of molecules
would then be impossible; naturally there would then be no water
and hence no life. If the electromagnetic
force were to be fractionally weaker, the atomic nucleus
would not be able to control the electrons; again, no molecules
could exist and neither could water and life.
The electromagnetic force
is 1040 stronger than gravity.
If it were 1041 stronger, gravity
would not be strong enough for the formation of stars. If, on the
contrary, it were 1039 stronger than gravity,
the stars would shortly burn out. The Sun would then not burn long
enough for the development of a biological evolution.
The
strong force ties the protons to the neutrons in the
atomic nucleus. Would it be slightly weaker, the only element
possible would be hydrogen, and if slightly stronger, only the
heavier elements would be in existence. In both cases water
could not exist and thus no life.
The weak force is
similarly precisely determined to enable the conversion process of
hydrogen to helium in the stars and in the Sun to take place
gradually(!). Moreover, this force is exactly right to enable the
heavier elements to form in the supernovas. Note that all elements
in the Universe and also on Earth are derived from supernovas.
ADDENDUM 2.
ABOUT THE LIFE-FRIENDLY
PROPERTIES OF PLANET EARTH
What is it that makes Earth into the celestial body capable of
sustaining life.
- The presence of the right temperature of about -20 to +40 C
(with a few variations up or down), a rare quality.
- The right mass; any heavier would swiftly result in an excess
of hydrogen in the atmosphere; much lighter would mean that no
atmosphere could be retained.
- The Sun has a life of about 10 billion years, enough time to
produce a biological evolution. Stars that form supernova have a
much shorter life of about 100 million years; they have a mass
more than 30 times that of the Sun.
- The orbit of Earth around the Sun is almost circular; if it
were elliptical, which is more usual, temperature variations
would be more extreme and soon result in difficulties for life.
- The distance to the Sun is, according to Prof. David Block,
exactly right; 5% further or 1% nearer would, he says, result in
impossible climatic conditions.
- The rotation of Earth in 24 hours is certainly good; Venus,
for instance, has a rotation of 243 Earthly days, resulting in
extreme temperatures and a day and night rhythm not conducive to
life.
- The atmosphere of Earth consists mainly of oxygen, necessary
for life. Moreover, this gas also has the potential of producing
ozone in the higher reaches of the atmosphere, protecting life
against the deadly UV radiation.
- The ratio of land and sea of about 2:5 is right for producing
enough rainfall for the existence of land life.
- The rather eccentric position of Earth in the Milky Way is
favourable; any closer to the centre would cause a
disturbance of the planets around the Sun because of the greater
concentration of masses. Any closer to the centre would result
in not all the elements being formed.
- The presence of a magnetic field around the Earth is
necessary; without that the atmosphere would have been blown
away by solar storms long ago.
In the future
probably more life-enhancing or necessary characteristics will be
discovered.
ADDENDUM 3.
ABOUT TASKS TO IMPROVE THE WORLD
WHICH COULD BE AND SHOULD BE UNDERTAKEN IN THE FIRST PLACE BY
INDIVIDUALS AND ORGANISATIONS BUT ALSO BY THE AUTHORITIES.
- Work towards shaping people.
Shaping people is directed towards
building character and personality (it differs in this respect
from education which focuses on knowledge and skills). Lessons of
Krishnamurti could possibly play a part in this. The insights and
possibilities on this subject depend on time and culture, but
should eventually come closer together. Family culture and
school education are of course the basis of character building.
And without doubt, friends, clubs and workplace contacts also play
a part. But we realise that this is insufficient. Too many people
are fixated on grudge and anger, plan evil deeds, think selfishly,
chase after money, to name but a few undesirable traits.
- Ending the ‘war on drugs’.
There is an urgent and unavoidable
need to end the war on drugs. This war has already been lost long
ago because the illegal products are easily available. It is
inconceivable that this war will continue for another hundred or
thousand years. The disadvantages of this approach are
considerable: for instance, sickness and deaths resulting from bad
drugs, the involvement of criminals with large sums of money in
their hands, resulting possibly in bribery of law-enforcement
officers and the intimidation of police and courts. The
advantages of ending this approach exceed by far the
disadvantages; there is no reason to expect a big increase in drug
use. The end of the war on drugs will certainly be felt with great
relief. Drugs would then be supplied by authorities, certainly
ensuring better purity. Murder rates would decrease; half the
prison population would be released; pressure on courts and police
would ease in many countries. Politicians would need courage and
skills, as no national government could implement this on its own.
Politicians in a number of countries need to ensure simultaneous
action. Other countries will soon follow. And all responsible
people will need to remind them constantly of this task. In
addition, it is naturally desirable that one would be warned about
the result of drug abuse, not for forty plus people but for
teenagers and those in their twenties with a history of drug
abuse. And if one does use drugs, it should be made clear what one
should definitely avoid and what one should definitely do.
- Research into the connection between phenomena.
It looks as if all phenomena in the
world are connected in a mysterious way; causality is but one
aspect of this. It is important to thoroughly research this
matter. Once that connection has been examined we may expect many
events can be predicted and revealed. That will benefit many
aspects of policy. Undesirable developments can then be
tackled at an early stage. Actual events can then be predicted,
preventing undesirable activities and criminal deeds to be carried
out in secret. If this vision is correct, the world will begin to
look quite different.
- Prevention of war and calamities.
As long as there are countries that
have armies and big and small weapons of destruction, there
will be the danger of war. The more countries that have weapons of
mass-destruction, the more threatening this danger becomes. A
second danger exists in that fanatics may acquire weapons of
mass-destruction. There is only one way to prevent big calamities
with some certainty, and that is to have global control over big
and small weapons of destruction, combined with a strict regime of
supervision. Countries with strong nationalism and a tendency to
militarism will not easily sign up to this. However, it must be
constantly made clear to those in power that continued resistance
to this plan will certainly result in wars/catastrophies with all
its terrible consequences. It does not mean that the whole plan
would then be scrapped, but what thinking person would accept the
misery and sorrows that such happenings would cause? The
central control should be placed in the hands of smaller countries
which have had a had a democratic constitutional state for some
time. Such countries are by nature not warlike.
- There are of course many more negative situations and
developments which need to be tackled or dealt with more
intensively. Without pretending to be complete or assuming that
they are the most important problems, here follows a list of
problems (not in order of urgency):
Birth control in developing
countries. Reducing disproportionate salaries. Promoting big
organisations that serve people in the first place and not
capital. Cleaning the oceans of masses of plastic disposables.
Helping unemployed people; that can only be achieved by creating
jobs and incomes. Tackling the problem that some people in some
countries feel like second-class citizens. Looking after animals
neglected by people and acting against cruelty to animals.
Resisting the destruction of nature and regaining of lost nature
(very urgent). Fighting poverty and the usual resulting hunger.
Naturally, there are many problems already being dealt with, but
in no case adequately.
Just a remark about
a global fault: we know that shared responsibility means no
responsibility. That applies to nations as well. A single example
(but there are other examples): imagine that the world consists of
one country. The plastic islands in the oceans would then
already have been cleared long ago ( now the world expects a 22
year old student to clear it up).
For the time being we shall have to manage it with a great
many countries, some with incompetent and corrupt leaders.
About action, it
starts as follows: usual with a handful of gifted and
concerned people. It is important that targets are set and results
are measured and made public. It is also of great importance that
the mass of people should feel involved in the world development
process.
|